Barbora Palicova vs Tessah Andrianjafitrimo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Jun at 06:25 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Palicova vs T. Andrianjafitrimo

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Palicova 1 - 0 Andrianjafitrimo
They have played 3 sets in total, with Barbora Palicova winning 2 and Tessah Andrianjafitrimo winning 1. The last match between Barbora Palicova and Tessah Andrianjafitrimo was at the Grado Open - Grado, 10-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Barbora Palicova getting the victory 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Palicova | 1 |
| Andrianjafitrimo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Grado Open - Grado(06-10-25)
B. Palicova vs T. Andrianjafitrimo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $246,615 | Career Prize Money | $185,698 |
| 58.54% (185-131) | Career Total W/L | 57.51% (337-249) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Palicova vs T. Andrianjafitrimo Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Palicova has secured 37.62% of points on her second serve, just edging past Andrianjafitrimo, who has managed 37.4%. Does this slight difference make Palicova a better server overall? Slightly, but not significantly so.
- Return Game Stats: On returning second serves, Andrianjafitrimo excels with 56.45%, outperforming Palicova's 52.9%. Additionally, Andrianjafitrimo is slightly better at returning first serves with 36.56% compared to Palicova's 33.55%, suggesting an edge in the return games.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Palicova has saved 50.35% of breakpoints, showing a slightly better ability to handle pressure than Andrianjafitrimo, who has saved 47.43%. Can this resilience give Palicova a mental edge during crucial moments? Possibly.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Andrianjafitrimo has shown greater success with a 70.15% win rate, overshadowing Palicova's 58.33%. Would this higher win percentage make her the favorite in a head-to-head match? Likely, based on overall performance.
- Best Surface: Palicova is at her best on indoor hard courts with a 63% win rate, while Andrianjafitrimo excels on outdoor hard courts, winning 66%. How does this surface preference impact their matchup? It depends on the court surface of the upcoming match.
- Player Level: In ITF tournaments over $10K, Andrianjafitrimo has secured a higher winning percentage at 71.88% compared to Palicova's 60.61%. Does playing at a higher level boost Andrianjafitrimo's chances? It suggests she might be better prepared for competitive matches.
- Opponent Quality Stats: Andrianjafitrimo has faced slightly lower ranked competition, ranked on average 352.72, while Palicova's opponents averaged a rank of 323.32. Does this give Palicova an edge in playing against tougher opponents? Potentially, as she's more accustomed to challenging matches.
- Deciding Set Performance: When a match reaches a deciding set, Andrianjafitrimo has won 64% of the time compared to Palicova's 54%. Does this indicate a stronger finish from Andrianjafitrimo? Yes, she might have the upper hand in endurance and clutch situations.
- Break Point Conversion: Palicova has a slightly better breakpoint conversion rate at 41.14% versus Andrianjafitrimo's 39.81%. Does this make her a more effective breaker? Marginally, though it's not a decisive factor.
Editorial Prediction (June 10, 2025, UTC):
In assessing both players' recent performances, Andrianjafitrimo shows a slight advantage in several critical areas that may influence the outcome of this match. Her superior return game statistics, notably on both first and second serves, could prove crucial, especially against an opponent like Palicova who just edges her on second serve winning percentage.
Additionally, Andrianjafitrimo's overall win percentage over the last year is notably higher, suggesting better form and recent success against her competition. Her proficiency in deciding sets further underlines her capability to capitalize on pivotal moments, enhancing her chances in tightly contested scenarios.
While Palicova exhibits strengths, particularly in breakpoint conversion and playing against higher-rated opponents, these factors may not suffice against Andrianjafitrimo’s comprehensive edge and consistency. Therefore, considering all statistics and recent form, Andrianjafitrimo is predicted to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Barbora Palicova vs Tessah Andrianjafitrimo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Palicova vs T. Andrianjafitrimo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 14 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 3:9:31 | Average Match Time | 3:9:31 |
| 63% (78/124) | 1st Serve % | 48% (49/102) |
| 51% (40/78) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (31/49) |
| 37% (17/46) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (15/53) |
| 58% (11/19) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (9/25) |
| 55% (56/102) | Return Points Win % | 54% (67/124) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Palicova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 1-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | ||
T. Andrianjafitrimo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 2-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||

B. Palicova vs T. Andrianjafitrimo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.54% (185/131) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.51% (337/249) |
| 56.75% (412/314) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.08% (770/603) |
| 53.50% (3580/3112) | Games Win/Loss | 52.73% (6541/5864) |
| 46.15% (24/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.41% (190/105) |
| 59.74% (92/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.42% (123/103) |
| 63.21% (67/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.84% (21/36) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 454 | Aces Total | 468 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1217 | Total Double Faults | 2355 |
| 1:37:50 | Average Match Time | 1:42:32 |
| 452.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 262.83 |
| 64% (13307/20654) | 1st Serve % | 63% (22558/35880) |
| 62% (8222/13307) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (13517/22484) |
| 45% (3317/7347) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5715/13396) |
| 48% (1307/2737) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2493/5083) |
| 47% (9715/20735) | Return Points Win % | 49% (17729/36512) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Slam W/L | 27.27% (6/16) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Main Tour W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 59.22% (151/104) | Challenger W/L | 57.91% (282/205) |
| 71.43% (25/10) | Futures W/L | 70.31% (45/19) |
| 59% (181/309) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (335/583) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (43/81) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (49/94) |
| 55% (56/102) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (106/202) |
| 84% (184/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (328/273) |
| 15% (184/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (328/55) |
| 21% (131/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (258/65) |